Showing posts with label 1860s. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 1860s. Show all posts

Saturday, December 10, 2016

1860's Plaid Dress



I made this dress years ago, literally. However, this is the first time I got to wear it to an event! Like all first wearings, it has a couple of minor issues but I wanted to show how the original dress looks in comparison to this one.

Here is the link to the one I was basing my gown off of. Below are a couple of the pictures of the dress.  I also used this one as a how-to to do the insides of the dress.  The inside is completely lined in linen.



As you can tell, the plaids are slightly different, but the color match was so good, I had to make this plaid into this dress.  Despite this not being my normal color combo, I really love this dress.  It was too small at the time I made it - I remember trying it on and it being too tight at the waist.  Now, however, it fits perfectly.  Yay!  I have one decent 1860's dress!

I made the sleeves slightly differently due to a lack of fabric.  I had slightly under 4 yards to work with and that meant every last bit counted.  

For some puffiness beneath the skirt, I wore my quilted petticoat.  I could have worn my hoops but: a) driving and hoops are not friends b)it's 34F in the day.  Quilted petticoats are a blessing when it's this cold.

I'm just happy right now that I have at least one thing that is Victorian that fits.  We aren't talking about what happened with the bustle dress I made earlier this year.   I would have worn it but ummm...the bodice fits over my sweater right now while wearing all modern clothing and not corset.   ..,So a new bustle dress is in the future!

Saturday, January 2, 2016

HSF/M 2015: Challenge #12: Re-Do Early Bustle Era Dress

The Challenge:  December – Re-Do:  It’s the last challenge of the year, so let’s keep things simple by re-doing any of the previous 11 challenges.
Fabric:  Silk taffeta, silk dupioni, cotton, netting
Pattern:   My own!
Year:   1869
Notions:  The turquoise trim, thread, hooks and eyes
How historically accurate is it?  Well, if it weren't for the crazy lining, it would be okay.  
Hours to complete:  Too many :-)
First worn:  Jan 2nd 2016  for the Christmas Tea
Total cost:  I have no idea.  I know the Valentine's day lining fabric was $2.50 a yard and I have a lot of it left over.  I think the silk taffeta was the $4.99 stuff I got from Golden silks this fall.  The dupioni was $3.84 a yard and I maybe used 4 yards of it?   The turquoise fringe trim was stash and I have no idea where I got it or how much it was.  Knowing me, it was probably ebay and therefore under$20 for the entire thing.  The Santa fabric was stash.  It was left over from my sister in law's quilt that I probably should finish posting....

My inspiration came mostly from a fashion plate at the Bartos Collection and a dress from the Met.   Loren of The costumer's closet gave me great advice on lining the skirts so they don't look de-puffed.  Thanks, Loren!

Somehow, my dress grew a tail while I was working on it.  I'm not sure how that happened.  You might be able to make out a black and white blurry shape in the upper left - that's Abigail.  She was excited that there was something hidden beneath the skirt!

The bodice lining.  I didn't have any cheap fabric or any scraps big enough on hand to line the dress with so....quilting cotton it was.  Santa was one hand but I only had enough for the bodice.  The sleeve and the underskirt are both lined in the Valentine's day print.  

Front of the dress.  The shoulders are a bit funky on me as well as the dress dummy but it's not super horrible.  Although, everyone was trying to look at my shoulders to figure out what the heck I had lined the bodice in .  I do need to add trim, buttons, and rework the bodice slightly.  

Close up of the apron skirt and the hemline of the underskirt.  I want to add puffs out of the blue/gold fabric.  The fabric is WAY prettier in person than in pictures.  It's a cross of aqua blue and an almost coppery goldish color.  The gold fabric is really a cross of gold and true royal purple (think a deep wine color).   

Back of the dress.  Obligatory butt bow is obligatory. 

Side view to show it really is a bustle dress.  :-)
So this qualifies for four of the 2015 challenges - blue, sewing secrets, stash busting, and out of your comfort zone.

  • Blue - The crossway of the silk is blue and I added a gold trim with turquoise stones to the hem.
  • Sewing Secrets- I doubt having a cat beneath your bustle counts but Santa and Valentine's day fabric probably does.   
  • Stash busting - everything is stuff I've had for at least a few months.  The trim is something I've had for years.
  • Out of your comfort zone - as some of you know, bustle scares me like nothing else in Historical costuming.  Give me 1890's sleeves, Elizabethan, or even something to completely hand sew that isn't a bustle and I'm fine.  Tell me I have to make a bustle and I immediately freak out.  I love the look.  It's a gorgeous period.  However, this is my fourth dress and this is the only one, in my opinion, that looks remotely like something they would have actually worn.   
I plan on adding a few bits to it before the next wearing.  I'm glad I finally made a bustle dress that looks halfway decent and not like a frumpy hot mess.   At least the skirt on this one came out okay without tears.   Although, there almost were tears when having to pleat the bottom hem - it took almost the entire movie of Castaway to get it right!

Thursday, May 14, 2015

Garibaldi Blouse: What it is and what it isn't.

I thought I wrote this up last year when I was investigating "Swiss Waists" and what they were really called, but I didn't.  Whoops!   I guess it's never too late!


When I first started looking in the 1860's, I kept coming across the term Garibaldi as a blouse women in the 1860's wore.   While I've discovered this is true, there appears to be some confusion on the very specific type of garment the Garibaldi is.

A Garibaldi is not this:

http://www.extantgowns.com/2014/04/late-1860s-blouse.html

Nor is it this:

https://archive.org/stream/godeysladysbook1863hale#page/n507/mode/1up


In an investigation I did, I found these styles are either called waists or spencers. What I Found already has a very good article on waists circa 1864 so I won't repeat the information here. Instead, spencers seem to appear only in Godey's:


Which might mean it was the "American" term versus the "British" term (think what "pants" means in American versus British today). I'm honestly not sure. However, based on the various fashion mags of the day, the fitted blouse was called either a waist or a spencer.

So what did a Garibaldi look like? Like this:







The above are all called "Garibaldi" and yes, they are all quite baggy. They were named after a famous Italian General who, among his many military victories and being a fore-father of modern Italy, was known for the baggy red shirts his volunteers would wear in lieu of a uniform. The term shows up in several magazines of the era as a baggy blouse although it can be referred to as a waist or a shirt.

The Garibaldi is meant to look very masculine.   Although it's great if you plan on working in the camp kitchen all day at a Civil War re-enactment, it's not exactly the most flattering garment.

The Garibaldi came in a wide variety of colors.  Although red and white were the most popular, blues, greens, and pinks are also mentioned in Peterson's and Godey's.   They could be silk, cotton, wool, or really any lightweight material of the day.

So, if you are like me and want a fitted blouse, it's a waist or spencer.  If you want a good work shirt, then it's a Garibaldi. 


Thursday, January 15, 2015

Historical Sew Monthly: Foundations

The Challenge:
Foundations: make something that is the foundation of a period outfit.

Fabric:
Cotton Muslin, Cotton Duck Cloth

Pattern: 
My Own!

Year: 
First Half of the 19th C from 1820 to 1860

Notions:
Pink cotton thread, white cotton thread, Bamboo wood edge from a placemat, cotton twine

How historically accurate is it?
For 1860 - not to shabby. It's machine sewn in part with the upper edge being hand sewn, hand bound eyelets, and hand done embroidery.

Hours to complete:
5 or 6, I think?

First worn:
This weekend, I hope.

Total cost:
Everything was stash so maybe $6?  I think the placemat was $2 when I bought it and I know the muslin wasn't exactly pricey.  The thread was part of a large batch I got years upon years ago from a thrift store for 10 cents.





And the rest of the story!

So, gussets don't like me.  Actually, I know of very few ladies who are gifted up top that can wear gussets without complaint.  Therefore, I went looking for a pair of stays that would work for the Romantic era that didn't have gussets and I found a few.

The first pair I found, and the pair I based this one off of is actually from 1860.  Although it does have side gussets, it's not the type that you typically see with the earlier stays.  Rather, these look more like piecing than that for cup size.  Another one I liked that was from the right time period (1810 - 1830) is at the Met and also lacked the cup gussets.  Both are pretty similar in shape.

The sides to the pieces for the stay I made are curved but the back edge is straight.  I thought it looked way too plain once it was done so I added a bit of embroidery where the busk is.   The busk being the bamboo edge to a placemat I took apart years ago.

It's not the prettiest pair of stays, but it is functional and I finally have a pair of long stays!

EDIT:   Here is another example of stays without gussetsAnd another...  And another!  They might not have been the most common, but they also weren't unknown.  

Monday, June 16, 2014

Historical Sew Fortnightly #11: The Politics of Fashion


The Challenge:The Politics of Fashion
Fabric: Cotton Sateen
Pattern:  My own!
Year:  1864 ish
Notions: Lace, hooks and eyes.
How historically accurate is it? The pattern is correct. Using a sewing machine is correct. However, I should have lined the skirt (it would have helped a lot from it riding up on the hoop constantly! gah!) so, eh.
Hours to complete: The research was the worst part of this one. That was a good two days! The outfit itself only took maybe 5 or so hours.
First worn: June 14th
Total cost: I think I paid $20 for the fabric many MANY years ago. I'm destashing. The lace was some lace someone gave me.

Additional Information:

First, read here on my investigation into what the heck I'm wearing. :-) I originally thought that there must be something "political" about the Swiss in the early 1860's to get the name. However, it turns out, it might just be re-enactor politics instead. The Swiss Bodice in period was a little girl's garment that laced up the front - not the thing I'm wearing. Instead, this, it turns out, was called a corsage.

I have no idea why we call it a Swiss waist today when they clearly didn't in period. My only guess is that someone - probably back in the 1960's which is wear all bad terms seem to come from for all re-enactor type circles (SCA, CWA, ect)- declared that they were wearing a Swiss waist and no one ever questioned it because the person wearing said garment was an "authority" on such matters. I've seen it happen -and accidentally done so myself- many, many times. It's how the eye twitching "but purple is only for royalty" got started.

However, the dress I'm wearing also shows a bit of the politics of the 1860's. The 1860's was a time of war. Not only did we have the American Civil War; the second Opium war had just ended in 1860, France took over Mexico in 1863 because they could, Italy was in shambles, all of South America was at war, and New Zealand had it's own issues to worry about as well. ...and that's just to name a few. Basically, the world was a mess at the end of the 1850's/start of the 1860's.

This, of course, affected trade. The American South's entire cotton distribution was vastly disrupted. Importing it from India - which was under reconstruction via the Brits at the time- was going to be outrageous. So to have cotton at all showed that either I re-made an old dress or I had some money. This is why so many dresses from the early 1860's are just remade 1850's pieces - you had to because it was next to impossible to buy cloth to make clothing unless you had some money. The cloth itself speaks to the politics of the era.

What's in a name? Or an investigation into "Swiss Waists".


The Swiss bodices (not pretty for grown people) are charming for little girls. They consist of a stiff bodice, covered with silk, and made without sleeves; a chemisette and full puffed sleeves are put on, and over this the Swiss bodice, which is sometimes tied with a bow and ends of a ribbon – Englishwoman’s Domestic Magazine Vol 5 Issue 25 – Vol 6 Issue 36 pg 141

The Swiss Bodice and various cinctures, of which we have often spoken, are also much worn by little girls over white dresses, with large bows and flowing ends at the back. – Peterson’s Magazine V45-46 (April 1864)


These were two of the many quotes I found when I first started to look into Swiss Waists.  The first thing I discovered was that, in period, there were Swiss Bodices but no Swiss Waists.  However, Swiss Bodices were for children...despite seeing what we call Swiss Waists as part of fashion plates on grown ups right next to Swiss Bodices are for kids!  So, I decided to do research.


We get a clue as to what these children's Swiss Bodice looked like from a satire magazine from 1860:



This is what they say about the 15th Century dress in the picture:
The form that was most fashionable was to have the front left open from the neck down to the waist, with a turnover roll collar, made of a dark colour bordering the aperture. A stomacher of cloth or linen covered the breast beneath, and occasionally the gown was laced together over it in the mode of the Swiss Bodice.

First, it makes me giggle to no end that the mid 19th Century equivalent to the Onion is trying to describe a Burgundian gown and failing miserably. Does that make it a double fail or a win since it's a satire? I have no idea.

Anyway, it does give us a big clue as to what a Swiss Bodice really is - it's what unfortunately every single lazy e-bay seller calls a corset today; something that has lacing across the front of it. It doesn't matter if it's actually a corset or not, it has criss cross lacing on it! Apparently, sadly, this is not a new thing but rather been renamed.

However, when I went to test this theory that all things with laces on children's dresses are Swiss Bodices...it failed.



Fig 2 – Child’s dress. The skirt is of mauve polin-ette, with three flounces.  The waist is white muslin tucked, made square, and trimmed with Valenciennes lace.  The sleeves are one puff.  Over this is worn a little green silk corsage, which consists of side bodies only, the front and back being merely straps of the silk. Godey's 1862

Alright, so maybe it's just because it's a jumper dress and not a bodice/waist?   Despite this, I did find some crediance to my theory of "any laced up the front is Swiss!"

Their pleasing appearance is much heightened by their graceful dress.  Over their white linen chemisettes, made with full short sleeves, they wear bodices laced up in the front like the Swiss, and frequently ornamented with gold brocade; The Ladies' Companion, and Monthly Magazine




From the NY Public Library

So what is the black thing around the middle ladies waist called then if not a Swiss waist? Here's the description of the middle dress from Godey's:


Fig. 3. — Lavender poplin dress, with black velvet
corsage. The skirt is trimmed with black velvet in
hands, lozenges, and bows, the same as on the body and
Mauves of the dress. Small lace collar, with black



So here it is called a "corsage" but is that what everyone called it?  Apparently not.


In Peterson's from March 1864, it's referred to as a waist.

This is one of the very few times it is referred to as a Swiss bodice (not waist) from Godey's 1862.


From Godey's Magazine 1865:
Fig 3 – Skirt of a delicate shade of mauve goat’s hair cloth, ornamented by two bands richly embroidered in chain-stich.  Fancy corsage of purple silk, trimmed with guipure lace and jet buttons.  Guimpe and sleeves of French muslin, tucked and trimmed with embroidery.  Leghorn hat, trimmed with one purple and black feather.  The hair is rolled from the face and galls in curls at the back. 


Again, it's referred to as a corsage. Doing a quick search through books from 1855-1865, it looks like corsage was the most common term for what we today call a Swiss Waist.

I have no idea how the term evolved from corsage to Swiss Waist over the past 150 years. However, I originally looked into the term thinking there must be something going on with the Swiss at that point to get the term. Although all things Swiss was popular...it was mostly because of the fan following of the Swiss Family Robinson. Sort of like every single young adult and adult book series in the past 15 years.....(OMG! It has a Twilight/Harry Potter/Hunger Games/Game of Thrones reference!!!! MUST HAVE!!!!)


Saturday, January 11, 2014

2013 Sewing Round Up part 2

Here is everything I can remember that I attempted in the second half of 2013:

July

August


September



October
  • HSF #20: Little Red Riding HoodDSC04513
  • Nephews Halloween Outfits (the entry for Middle Child's Butterfly can be seen Here) Oldest is Link from Zelda and youngest was supposed to be a jester but it's hard to tell as he raced in front of the camera
  • A better picture of the oldest and middle child nephews:
  • A very bad attempt at a zibellino DSC04882
  • A new jacket DSC04885

November

December

So, believe it or not, there was even more stuff I did - like the hideous pink bustle dress from Hell- but I really don't like those at all and would much rather not remember them so...here's the final list!

And in the next post, hopefully, oldest nephew's birthday gift.